‘wisdom of the world’, which is the standard by which they would modify the religious tradition, varies from one social location to another; what is worse, even in the same locale it keeps on changing, often rapidly.44 Berger’s sociological analysis makes it clear that some views will be ‘the accepted wisdom in one social milieu and utter foolishness in another’. Or, to put it another way, it is not a universal way of thinking or set of values; it is socially located, in a specific class or social
Pages 120–121